|Posted on Friday, August 9, 2002 - 6:33 am: |
5.2.1 is the latest version for Mac OS X. I also just checked using Omniweb, which is the coolest browser, and it worked perfectly on your site.
|Posted on Thursday, August 8, 2002 - 10:11 pm: |
My fault. I use IE 6.0 (or latest) - I should check for older browsers. Thanks.
|Posted on Thursday, August 8, 2002 - 9:18 pm: |
Actually Nolamour's site doesn't work at all with IE 5.2.1 under Mac OS X. The wrought iron stuff is in front of the text, pics and links, and you can't click on anything. I checked with Netscape 6.2, and everything worked fine. (I never use Netscape anymore.)
I'm not complaining or insulting, just reporting.
|Posted on Thursday, August 8, 2002 - 8:23 am: |
DIO Rules! Actually he's about 4 foot nothing and half bald.
(hand gestures the secret devil sign)
|Posted on Thursday, August 8, 2002 - 6:58 am: |
Didnt Ronnie James Dio invent 666 ?
|Posted on Thursday, August 8, 2002 - 12:19 am: |
Bill Gates is the devil incarnate...he has "" tatooed above his hairline.
(As we all know, bigger is better.)
|Posted on Thursday, August 8, 2002 - 12:11 am: |
This is a long time battle, so to speak. Which to use, which is better, and so forth. I guess it's all preference. I personally do not care for Nutscrape...er Netscape, but it is definitely necessary to check due to the few (so I'm told) that still use it.
I've also encountered differences with PC vs. Mac users, with regard to viewing websites. Yet another old war. They both have their advantages.
|Posted on Wednesday, August 7, 2002 - 10:15 pm: |
I think most people these days test for Internet Explorer and Netscape, then they stop testing. Is a standard created by two companies that much better than a standard created by one?
|Posted on Wednesday, August 7, 2002 - 5:34 pm: |
Not to break into this Texas 2-step y'all'r doin', but what broken linksare you talking about? Which browser are ya runnin, Chonger? Mosaic 2.0?