Can I post something ludicrous?

Sepulchritude Forum: The Absinthe Forum Archive Thru March 2002: Archive thru January 2002:Can I post something ludicrous?
By Pablo on Thursday, January 31, 2002 - 02:25 am: Edit

Ok, looking back I wonder. How drunk was I?

(pablo needs an intervention, and a drink)

By Louched_Liver on Wednesday, January 30, 2002 - 12:19 pm: Edit

Jesus Christ.

By _Blackjack on Wednesday, January 30, 2002 - 01:29 am: Edit

That Justice statue has been causing problems ever since Ed Meese presented his report on pornography while standing in front of it.

By Pablo on Wednesday, January 30, 2002 - 12:33 am: Edit

Hey, why is it that now anyone who questions any action of the gov't is unpatriotic? Isn't that what a citizen by definition is supposed to do?
(pablo scrolls down and relaxes, looking at the boobies)

By Pablo on Wednesday, January 30, 2002 - 12:24 am: Edit

You guys have it all wrong! Asscroft had the drapes put up while justice is "modernized". To be more politically correct she will now have breasts and a huge ball sack! The breasts will be covered, the sack out in the open for all the world to see!-JUSTICE IS NO LONGER BLIND! SHES JUST WELL HUNG!
(pablo must now go into hiding as this is grounds for inprisonment for months without being charged with any crime.-New antiterrorism laws.)

By Head_Prosthesis on Tuesday, January 29, 2002 - 07:59 pm: Edit

Here's Hinaki for Heiko...
Maybe she can ring your bells.

Didder went DING-A-LING!!!

By Head_Prosthesis on Tuesday, January 29, 2002 - 07:20 pm: Edit

...Levi Strauss...

By Head_Prosthesis on Tuesday, January 29, 2002 - 07:20 pm: Edit

Keep staring at the red lines in her tummy... You'll see the future.

By Pikkle on Tuesday, January 29, 2002 - 07:19 pm: Edit

Earth Mother baby!!!

By Head_Prosthesis on Tuesday, January 29, 2002 - 07:16 pm: Edit

Keep drinking, you'll see it.

By Heiko on Tuesday, January 29, 2002 - 07:11 pm: Edit

not sexy. Even after 10 beer, I'd rather have an 11th than touch this momma.

That proves my theory - for me, at least ;-)

By Head_Prosthesis on Tuesday, January 29, 2002 - 05:13 pm: Edit

PROVE IT!!!

By Pikkle on Tuesday, January 29, 2002 - 04:56 pm: Edit

Toe hair baby, toe hair... mmm.

By Verawench on Tuesday, January 29, 2002 - 04:56 pm: Edit

There was a great book, forget title, about the sexuality of Christ in Renaissance art.

Countless religious paintings showing two scenes in particular - the Madonna presenting the infant Jesus and the Cruxifiction - placed clear emphasis on Christ's genitalia.

The most obvious examples were later badly disguised, others ignored.

This way, of course, a great point about Reinaissance art was completely missed. The figure of Christ had its humanity deliberately emphasized, making him a poster child for the great humanists of the 14th-16th centuries.

People are such fucking idiots.

By Heiko on Tuesday, January 29, 2002 - 04:16 pm: Edit

I always had that theory in mind, maybe it's true: Because Americans are not allowed to see breasts anywhere, they get totally crazy about them. This is the only reason I can think of why anyone would find big silicone breasts sexy or even beautiful. A nice butt is 1000 times more sexy than a pair of boobs.
But maybe that's just my personal taste and has nothing to do with "breast-prohibition" in the States ;-)

By Pikkle on Tuesday, January 29, 2002 - 03:59 pm: Edit

oops, tee hee!

By Barsnake on Tuesday, January 29, 2002 - 03:59 pm: Edit

Also - noted today that there is a gender neutral edition of the Bible -
So I guess we can say "Let He, She, or It who is without sin cast the first stone".

By Pikkle on Tuesday, January 29, 2002 - 03:58 pm: Edit

Nudity is bad. We were born nude. How dare we be born nude! How dare we be born! Being born is bad.

By Pikkle on Tuesday, January 29, 2002 - 03:58 pm: Edit

Nudity is bad. We were born nude. How dare we be born nude! How dare we be born!

By Mr_Rabid on Tuesday, January 29, 2002 - 03:56 pm: Edit

At our state capitol building, there are statues of (formerly) nekkid people out front.

On night I walked by to see scaffolding. Curious, I approached.

Genital mutilation, done in stone. Nipples sanded away. Holes drilled to affix GREAT BIG POORLY DONE FIG LEAVES.

Why doesn't art get an avenging angel of it's own?
C'mon, Man Upstairs! Let's see some smiting here!

By Pikkle on Tuesday, January 29, 2002 - 03:55 pm: Edit

He was probably never breast fed as a baby and I can kind of understand his concern there...

By Mvario on Tuesday, January 29, 2002 - 03:46 pm: Edit

so, like, is he afraid to be associated with nudity, or is he afraid to be associated with justice?

By Baz on Tuesday, January 29, 2002 - 02:24 pm: Edit

I just wish that these guys would get a grasp on priorities. Solve the nation's problems, or make sure we don't see naked boobies? tough call. Next they'll be telling us what we can and can't do with our own bodies!


Wait a minute...

By Admin on Tuesday, January 29, 2002 - 01:58 pm: Edit

No, he has just refused to be photographed in front of the statues any more. And its just a coincidence that they bought the drapery they've been renting for social functions where Justice might parade herself like the old French Whore that she is.

By Verawench on Tuesday, January 29, 2002 - 01:39 pm: Edit

Apparently Ashcroft had no knowledge of this. This is the work of paranoid PR personel.

Nevertheless, we're talking about a man who calls Jesus his only master.

By Wolfgang on Tuesday, January 29, 2002 - 01:23 pm: Edit

Thats because they surely don`t understand the symbolic meaning of this statue.

Justice is not a mother anymore, it`s just a pile of papers and some nondescript numbered citizens.

By Baz on Tuesday, January 29, 2002 - 01:22 pm: Edit

Great, I've only been here two days and my button is pushed...
This is what passes for intelligence these days. these are our policy makers and law makers. They have no fucking idea what is really controversial, so they try to make everything uncontroversial, in the name of progress. Yet the things they consider controversial have hardly "progressed" since 1650. Look at some of the Bozo's on capital hill...
Take something that is genuinely controversial, like these "patriot" laws following 9-11. They take away rights guaranteed by the constitution, rights that our country was founded on. I consider that controversial. But, to a bozo on capital hill, opposition to these laws is what is considered controversial. Reminds me of Mccarthyism, where everyone knows it's wrong but can't seem to get a handle on their balls in order to do what's right. Right is too controversial.
I think I'm getting too wound up over nothing, so I leave you with a quote-

As nightfall does not come at once, neither does oppression. In both instances, there's a twilight where everything remains seemingly unchanged, and it is in such twilight that we must be aware of change in the air, however slight, lest we become unwitting victims of the darkness.
-Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglass

By Admin on Tuesday, January 29, 2002 - 01:01 pm: Edit

Americans have traditionally been silly prudes. I guess some of us still are.

it's JUSTICE ferchrissakes!!!

I cringe.

By Heiko on Tuesday, January 29, 2002 - 01:00 pm: Edit

You must understand that there is nothing more evil than naked breasts.
Evil! Bad! From Hell!
n'kay??

By Wolfgang on Tuesday, January 29, 2002 - 12:23 pm: Edit

This is ridiculous. I hate those tie wearing assholes. I HATE them !

They are the one we should hide behind a drape.

By Admin on Tuesday, January 29, 2002 - 12:16 pm: Edit

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2002/01/29/national0911EST0519.DTL

I think John Ashcroft was getting embarrassing erections during press conferences.

Administrator's Control Panel -- Board Moderators Only
Administer Page |Delete Conversation |Close Conversation |Move Conversation